What engineers Donʼt learn and why they Don learn it: And how philosophy might be able to help

Abstract

This paper presented at WPE-2008 uses an industrial-based senior design as an opportunity to understand what what students don't learn in a fairly traditional cold war engineering curriculum. The paper identifies seven deficient skills: questioning, labeling, qualitative modeling, decomposing, visualizing/ideation, empirical testing, and communicating. The talk also identifies five reasons why engineers don't learn these things, and philosophy plays a prominent role in recifying the problem by aiding in providing conceptual clarity and offering alternative models of rigor.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Learning theory and epistemology.Kevin Kelly - 2004 - In Ilkka Niiniluoto, Matti Sintonen & Jan Wolenski (eds.), Handbook of Epistemology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. pp. 183--203.
Words, you, and me.Arthur B. Cody - 2002 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):277 – 293.
The importance of philosophy to engineering.Carl Mitcham - 1998 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):27-47.
Learning from questions on categorical foundations.Colin McLarty - 2005 - Philosophia Mathematica 13 (1):44-60.
Learning how to learn: A critique.Christopher Winch - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):649-665.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-24

Downloads
28 (#555,203)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references