- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The tree property at double successors of singular cardinals of uncountable cofinality
Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 169 (2):164-175 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The tree property at double successors of singular cardinals of uncountable cofinality with infinite gaps.Mohammad Golshani & Alejandro Poveda - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (1):102853.
The tree property at first and double successors of singular cardinals with an arbitrary gap.Alejandro Poveda - 2020 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 171 (5):102778.
The tree property and the failure of SCH at uncountable cofinality.Dima Sinapova - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):553-562.
The Strong and Super Tree Properties at Successors of Singular Cardinals.William Adkisson - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-33.
Blowing up the power of a singular cardinal of uncountable cofinality with collapses.Sittinon Jirattikansakul - 2023 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 174 (6):103257.
Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal.Spencer Unger - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):483-496.
Souslin trees and successors of singular cardinals.Shai Ben-David & Saharon Shelah - 1986 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 30 (3):207-217.
The tree property at the double successor of a singular cardinal with a larger gap.Sy-David Friedman, Radek Honzik & Šárka Stejskalová - 2018 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 169 (6):548-564.
Perfect tree forcings for singular cardinals.Natasha Dobrinen, Dan Hathaway & Karel Prikry - 2020 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 171 (9):102827.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-10-25
Downloads
36 (#503,210)
6 months
21 (#191,325)
2017-10-25
Downloads
36 (#503,210)
6 months
21 (#191,325)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The tree property at the double successor of a singular cardinal with a larger gap.Sy-David Friedman, Radek Honzik & Šárka Stejskalová - 2018 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 169 (6):548-564.
The tree property at first and double successors of singular cardinals with an arbitrary gap.Alejandro Poveda - 2020 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 171 (5):102778.
The tree property at double successors of singular cardinals of uncountable cofinality with infinite gaps.Mohammad Golshani & Alejandro Poveda - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (1):102853.
References found in this work
On certain indestructibility of strong cardinals and a question of Hajnal.Moti Gitik & Saharon Shelah - 1989 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 28 (1):35-42.
The tree property at א ω+2.Sy-David Friedman & Ajdin Halilović - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (2):477 - 490.
On sequences generic in the sense of Magidor.Gunter Fuchs - 2014 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 79 (4):1286-1314.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-9b866bbb8-9kmcf uwo