The right to treatment for self-inflicted conditions

Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (11):683-686 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The increasing awareness of personal health responsibility had led to the claim that patients with ‘self-inflicted’ conditions have less of a right to treatment at the public's expense than patients whose conditions arose from ‘uncontrollable’ causes. This paper suggests that regardless of any social decision as to the limits and scope of individual responsibility for health, the moral framework for discussing this issue is equality. In order to reach a consensus, discourse should be according to the common basis of all theories of justice, Aristotle's formal principle of justice: ‘equals must be treated equally and unequals must be treated unequally, in proportion to the relevant inequality’. This paper deals with the question of whether and under what circumstances risk-taking behaviour could be regarded as a ‘relevant inequality’ with respect to the right to health care. Following a discussion of the relevant inequalities in health care, the conclusion is reached that the fact that the condition was avoidably caused by the patient and is therefore his or her fault can not be regarded necessarily as a relevant inequality. Therefore, the issue is one of societal support for health care; after defining relevant inequalities in this respect, the paper attempts to apply them to self-inflicted conditions. This analysis reveals that, in theory, it may be just to restrict societal support in such cases. However, the application of this conclusion requires proof of many factual claims—for which there is often very limited evidence

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,088

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who do we treat first when resources are scarce?Tom Walker - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):200-211.
Ethics and welfare: The case of hunting.Roger Scruton - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (4):543-564.
Predictive genetic testing for conditions that present in childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Conducting clinical research in polish conditions.Marek Labon - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):185-188.
Suicide and Self-Inflicted Death.R. G. Frey - 1981 - Philosophy 56 (216):193 - 202.
Self inflicted harm--NICE in ethical self destruct mode?S. Holm - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):125-126.
Solidarity in perinatal medicine.B. Cadore, P. Boitte, G. Demuijnck, D. Greiner & D. Jacquemin - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):435-454.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
32 (#445,919)

6 months
7 (#213,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Cost-effectiveness analysis: is it ethical?A. Williams - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):7-11.
Responsibility for health: personal, social, and environmental.D. B. Resnik - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):444-445.
Are alcoholics less deserving of liver transplants?Daniel Brudney - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (1):41-47.
Need--is a consensus possible?A. Culyer - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (2):77-80.

View all 9 references / Add more references