Shifting the Focus While Conserving Commitments in Research Ethics

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (2):103-113 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The papers in this volume are largely about research ethics and cover questions of consent, reproduction, pediatric research, ethical codes, and clinical relationships. Half the papers have this common aspect: they are conservative—in the sense of supporting the standard, prevailing, or popular view—but they shift the focus—supporting the standard views in terms of moral factors generally neglected by the literature. The volume provides a diverse set of papers for the reader: variously addressing abstract and concrete problems from within different philosophical traditions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Research Ethics Education in Economics.Altug Yalcintas & Selcuk I. Sirin - 2016 - Review of Social Economy 74 (1):53 - 74.
FOCUS: Focus groups: Are they viable in ethics research?Shailendra Vyakarnam - 1995 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 4 (1):24–29.
FOCUS: Focus Groups: Are they Viable in Ethics Research?Shailendra Vyakarnam - 1995 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 4 (1):24-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-28

Downloads
33 (#470,805)

6 months
13 (#185,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tyron Goldschmidt
King's College London (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Minimal risk as an international ethical standard in research.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (3):351 – 378.
Bioethics and history.Robert Baker - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (4):447 – 474.

View all 33 references / Add more references