- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reply to Rik Peels
Journal of Philosophical Research 47:243-247 (2022)
Abstract
Rik Peels (2022) suggests that my account of the normative pressures involved in cases of testimony from a friend need to be supplemented. I respond by accepting the proposed supplements; in fact, I argue that they are implications of the view I defended.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Derivative Differential Responsibility: A Reply to Peels.Benjamin Rossi - 2018 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):139-151.
Reply to Charity Anderson.Sanford C. Goldberg - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Research 47:229-235.
Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology, by Rik Peels, New York, Oxford University Press, 2017: A Précis of Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology. [REVIEW]Rik Peels - 2018 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26 (4):601-643.
Review of Rik Peels' Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology. [REVIEW]Gunnar Björnsson - 2017 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 201710.
The Social Dimension of Responsible Belief: Response to Sanford Goldberg.Rik Peels - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Research 44:79-88.
Reconciling reason and religion: A response to peels.Brian Zamulinski - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (1):109-113.
Response to Elqayam, Nottelmann, Peels and Vahid on my paper 'Perspectivism, deontologism and epistemic poverty'.Robert Lockie - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (3):21-47.
Reconciling reason and religion: A response to peels: Brian Zamulinski.Brian Zamulinski - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (1):109-113.
Reply to My Interlocutors.Don Ihde - 2016 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 20 (2):168-176.
Social mechanisms and explaining how : A reply to Kimberly Chuang.Johannes Persson - 2012 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 1 (9):37-41.
Precis of Conversational Pressure.Sanford C. Goldberg - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Research 47:195-197.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-10-29
Downloads
12 (#996,020)
6 months
3 (#760,965)
2022-10-29
Downloads
12 (#996,020)
6 months
3 (#760,965)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-67c5d994d4-wzg2g uwo