Monotheism's Euthyphro Problem

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):585 - 589 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The object here is to develop a moral argument against theism. By “theism” is meant the worship of a omnipotent, all righteous God. An attitude of worship, it may be assumed, would not be an attitude of worship if it did not preclude all doubt as to the worthiness of the object of worship. At any rate, it is only this attitude whose castigation as immoral is meant to be argued for here.There are, of course, as many theisms as there are theistic religions, sects, cults, denominations et cetera. let M be the moral code of one such theism. It is immaterial here whether the moral code M is or is not dogmatically spelled out in the theistic religion in question. The present argument will follow equally well if the believers claim nothing more than an imperfect, incomplete, and uncertain knowledge of M.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics and God.Lenn E. Goodman - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations 34 (2):135-150.
Trinity Monotheism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Philosophia Christi 5 (2):375 - 403.
Myth and the Structure of Plato’s Euthyphro.Daniel Werner - 2012 - International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (1):41-62.
Radical monotheism and Western civilization.H. Richard Niebuhr - 1960 - Lincoln,: University of Nebraska.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
34 (#458,553)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Goldstick
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references