Kant on Demarcation and Discovery
Kant Yearbook 9 (1):43-62 (2017)
Abstract
Kant makes two claims in the Critique of Pure Reason that anticipate concerns of twentieth-century philosophy of science. The first, that the understanding and sensibility are constitutive of knowledge, while reason is responsible for transcendental illusion, amounts to his solution to Karl Popper’s “problem” of demarcating science from pseudoscience. The second, that besides these constitutive roles of the understanding and sensibility, reason is itself needed to discover new empirical knowledge, anticipates Hans Reichenbach’s distinction between the “contexts” of justification and discovery. Unlike Reichenbach, however, who thinks that there can be a “logic” only of justification, Kant provides what amounts to a logic of discovery. Though Kant’s broader concerns are not Popper’s or Reichenbach’s, using theirs as framing devices reveals two otherwise unnoticed things about the Critique of Pure Reason. First, besides its general epistemological and metaphysical aims, the Critique lays groundwork for the twentieth century’s specialized field of the philosophy of science. Second, Kant’s solution to the demarcation problem contradicts his logic of discovery, so in this instance the Critique is too ambitious.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1515/kantyb-2017-0003
My notes
Similar books and articles
Loki's wager and Laudan's error: on genuine and territorial demarcation.Maarten Boudry - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 79--98.
The conception of lawlikeness in Kant's philosophy of science.Gerd Buchdahl - 1972 - Synthese 23 (1-2):24 - 46.
The demarcation problem: a (belated) response to Laudan.Massimo Pigliucci - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 9.
Loki's Wager and Laudan's Error.On Genuine & Territorial Demarcation - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 79.
Has Laudan killed the demarcation problem?Kirsten Walsh - 2009 - Dissertation, University of Melbourne
Why the Demarcation Problem Matters.Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem.
Parapsychology and the demarcation problem.Robert L. Morris - 1987 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):241 – 251.
The Rhetorical Construction of Science: Demarcation as Rhetorical Practice.Charles Alan Taylor - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Scientific discovery: that-what’s and what-that’s.Samuel Schindler - 2015 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2.
The Problem of Demarcation: History and Future.Thomas Nickles - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 101.
Two Ways of Studying the History of Culture.Leonid M. Batkin & M. M. Bahhtin - 1988 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 26 (4):6-28.
The search for the" soul organ"-Kant's philosophical analysis of Soemmerring's anatomical discovery.W. Euler - 2002 - Kant Studien 93 (4):453-480.
On an Allegedly Essential Feature of Criteria for the Demarcation of Science.Sebastian Lutz - 2011 - The Reasoner 5 (8):125–126.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-10-12
Downloads
16 (#669,090)
6 months
1 (#447,993)
2017-10-12
Downloads
16 (#669,090)
6 months
1 (#447,993)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Revising Fiction, Fact, and Faith: A Philosophical Account.Nathaniel Gavaler Goldberg & Chris Gavaler - 2020 - New York: Routledge.