Interpreting the neuroscience of imagery

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):190-191 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pylyshyn rightly argues that the neuroscientific data supporting the involvement of the visual system in mental imagery is largely irrelevant to the question of the format of imagistic representation. The purpose of this commentary is to support this claim with a further argument.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
64 (#254,276)

6 months
3 (#984,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ian Gold
McGill University

Citations of this work

Look again: Phenomenology and mental imagery. [REVIEW]Evan Thompson - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):137-170.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references