Interpreting Thomas Kuhn as a Response-Dependence Theorist

International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):729 - 752 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract Thomas Kuhn is the most famous historian and philosopher of science of the last century. He is also among the most controversial. Since Kuhn's death, his corpus has been interpreted, systematized, and defended. Here I add to this endeavor in a novel way by arguing that Kuhn can be interpreted as a global response-dependence theorist. He can be understood as connecting all concepts and terms in an a priori manner to responses of suitably situated subjects to objects in the world. Further, I claim, this interpretation is useful for three reasons. First, it allows us to systematize and defend Kuhn's views. We can therefore better appreciate him as a thinker in his own right. Second, it deepens our understanding of both the uniqueness of Kuhn's views and the continuity of those views with those of others. We can therefore better appreciate his place in history. And third, as I explain in the paper, my interpretation affords us the only example of an ethnocentric global response-dependence theory. We can therefore better appreciate the versatility of response-dependence itself.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The spell of Kuhn on psychology: An exegetical elixir.William O'Donohue - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (3):267 – 287.
Subjective views of Kuhn.Peter Achinstein - 2001 - Perspectives on Science 9 (4):423-432.
Why Response-Dependence Theories of Morality are False.Jeremy Randel Koons - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (3):275-294.
Thomas Kuhn's irrationalism.James Franklin - 2000 - New Criterion 18 (10):29-34.
Two conceptions of response-dependence.Rafael De Clercq - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (2):159-177.
Acceptance-dependence: A social kind of response-dependence.Frank A. Hindriks - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):481–498.
Recovering Thomas Kuhn.Joseph Rouse - 2013 - Topoi 32 (1):59-64.
Kuhnian puzzle solving and schema theory.Thomas Nickles - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):255.
Polanyi vs. Kuhn.Martin X. Moleski - 2006 - Tradition and Discovery 33 (2):8-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-15

Downloads
82 (#200,969)

6 months
20 (#126,159)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathaniel Goldberg
Washington and Lee University

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Inquiries Into Truth And Interpretation.Donald Davidson - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 74 references / Add more references