- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
But do we need universal grammar? Comment on Lidz et al
Cognition 94 (1):77-84 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
But do we need universal grammar? Comment on Lidz et al.Adele E. Goldberg - 2004 - Cognition 94 (1):77-84.
Comment on: But do we need universal Grammar? by Ameka, FK et al.Adele F. Goldberg - 2004 - Cognition 94 (1):77-84.
Yes, we still need Universal Grammar.Jeffrey Lidz & Lila R. Gleitman - 2004 - Cognition 94 (1):85-93.
Strategies in universal grammar: The case of meaning postulates in classical Montague grammar.Giorgio Sandri - 1987 - In D. D. Buzzetti & M. Ferriani (eds.), Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar, and Philosophical Analysis of Language. John Benjamins. pp. 42--229.
Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar.Jeffrey Lidz, Henry Gleitman & Lila Gleitman - 2003 - Cognition 87 (3):151-178.
Universal grammar? Or prerequisites for natural language?Adele E. Goldberg - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):522-523.
Switch-reference and universal grammar: proceedings of a Symposium on Switch Reference and Universal Grammar, Winnipeg, May 1981.John Haiman & Pamela Munro (eds.) - 1983 - Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
The Leibnizian Characteristica Universalis as link between grammar and logic.Burkhardt Hans - 1987 - In D. D. Buzzetti & M. Ferriani (eds.), Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar, and Philosophical Analysis of Language. John Benjamins. pp. 43--63.
Universal grammar as a theory of notation.Humphrey P. Polanen Van Petel - 2006 - Axiomathes 16 (4):460-485.
Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar, and Philosophical Analysis of Language.D. D. Buzzetti & M. Ferriani (eds.) - 1987 - John Benjamins.
What do we talk about when we talk?: speculative grammar and the semantics and pragmatics of focus.Johan van der Auwera - 1981 - Amsterdam: Benjamins.
In condillac.Raffaele Simone - 1987 - In D. D. Buzzetti & M. Ferriani (eds.), Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar, and Philosophical Analysis of Language. John Benjamins. pp. 42--65.
Turgot's 'Étymologie'and Modern Linguistics.Luigi Rosiello - 1987 - In D. D. Buzzetti & M. Ferriani (eds.), Speculative Grammar, Universal Grammar, and Philosophical Analysis of Language. John Benjamins. pp. 75--84.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
54 (#283,495)
6 months
13 (#165,103)
2014-01-20
Downloads
54 (#283,495)
6 months
13 (#165,103)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
When we think about thinking: The acquisition of belief verbs.Anna Papafragou - 2007 - Cognition 105 (1):125.
Yes, we still need Universal Grammar.Jeffrey Lidz & Lila R. Gleitman - 2004 - Cognition 94 (1):85-93.
Substantive learning bias or an effect of familiarity? Comment on.Adele E. Goldberg - 2013 - Cognition 127 (3):420-426.
Explanation and Constructions: Response to Adger.Adele E. Goldberg - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (4):479-491.
References found in this work
Primate Cognition.Amanda Seed & Michael Tomasello - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):407-419.
Do young children have adult syntactic competence?Michael Tomasello - 2000 - Cognition 74 (3):209-253.
Idioms.Geoffrey Nunberg, Ivan A. Sag & Thomas Wasow - 1994 - In Stephen Everson (ed.), Language. Cambridge University Press. pp. 491--538.
Understanding how input matters: verb learning and the footprint of universal grammar.Jeffrey Lidz, Henry Gleitman & Lila Gleitman - 2003 - Cognition 87 (3):151-178.
Learning argument structure generalizations.Adele E. Goldberg, Devin M. Casenhiser & Nitya Sethuraman - 2004 - Cognitive Linguistics 15 (3).
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo