A novel (and surprising) argument against justification internalism

Analysis 72 (2):239-243 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A variant 'evil demon' case is used to argue against internalism about doxastic justification. The argument is not merely novel but surprising, since evil demon cases have long been used by internalists against externalist accounts of doxastic justification

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Justification Matters.Declan Smithies - 2015 - In David K. Henderson & John Greco (eds.), Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 224-244.
Justification, Internalism, and Cream Cheese.Anthony Brueckner - 2009 - Philosophical Papers 38 (1):13-20.
Classical Foundationalism and Bergmann’s Dilemma for Internalism.Ali Hasan - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:391-410.
Justification and awareness.Peter J. Markie - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 146 (3):361 - 377.
Deontology and defeat.Michael Bergmann - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):87-102.
Weak Inferential Internalism.David Alexander - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37:357-377.
An argument that internalism requires infallibility.Alan Sidelle - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):163-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-21

Downloads
158 (#117,284)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sanford Goldberg
Northwestern University

References found in this work

Justification and truth.Stewart Cohen - 1984 - Philosophical Studies 46 (3):279--95.

Add more references