A Fine Conceptual Analysis Needs No “Ism”

Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):376-377 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Examining the Role of Re-Presentation in Mathematical Problem Solving: An Application of Ernst von Glasersfeld’s Conceptual Analysis” by Victor V. Cifarelli & Volkan Sevim. Upshot: The key philosophical premise of von Glasersfeld’s radical constructivism is not necessary to the insightful conceptual analysis presented by Cifarelli and Sevim, which could benefit from abandoning it

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Re-presentations and Conceptual Structures of What?K. C. Moore - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):371-373.
Issues Around Reflective Abstraction in Mathematics Education.C. Ulrich - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):370-371.
Radical Constructivism: A Scientific Research Program.L. P. Steffe - 2007 - Constructivist Foundations 2 (2-3):41-49.
Has psychology debunked conceptual analysis?Per Sandin - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 37 (1):26–33.
The proper province of philosophy.Justin Sytsma - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (3):427-445.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-15

Downloads
24 (#634,312)

6 months
1 (#1,520,257)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references