A non-eliminative understanding of austere nominalism

European Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):43–54 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How do we account for resemblance between concrete particular objects? What is it about reality which makes a sentence such as the following true? (1) x and y are both spherical Realists about properties claim that, at a fundamental level, this sentence is true because x and y both exemplify the property of sphericity. Michael Loux favours this account of resemblance. Nevertheless, Loux concedes that austere nominalism, which I understand to be the view that nothing exists over and above particular concrete objects, can offer a plausible account of resemblance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
110 (#155,091)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Goff
Durham University

Citations of this work

Grounding Nominalism.Peter Schulte - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (2):482-505.
Neo-Kantian constructivism and metaethics.Kirk Surgener - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Birmingham

Add more citations

References found in this work

From an ontological point of view.John Heil - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A World of States of Affairs.D. Armstrong - 1993 - Philosophical Perspectives 7:429-440.
Zombies and Consciousness.Robert Kirk - 2005 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 6 references / Add more references