Commentary on Jan Albert van Laar and Erik C. W. Krabbe, “Splitting a Difference of Opinion”

Abstract

Jan Albert van Laar and Erik Krabbe’s paper “Splitting a difference of opinion” studies an important type of dialogue shift, namely that from a deliberation dialogue over action or policy options where critical and persuasive argumentation is exchanged about the rational acceptability of the policy options proposed by various parties, to a negotiation dialogue where agreement is reached by a series of compromises, or trade-offs, on the part of each side in the disagreement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Dialogue foundations: Dialogue logic revisited: Erik C. W. Krabbe.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):33–49.
II—Erik C. W. Krabbe: Dialogue Logic Revisited.Erikc Krabbe - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):33-49.
Criticism in Need of Clarification.Jan Albert van Laar - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (4):401-423.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-23

Downloads
34 (#407,230)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Godden
Michigan State University

References found in this work

On the possibility of principled moral compromise.Daniel Weinstock - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (4):537-556.

Add more references