Being Good and Being Logical [Book Review]

Philosophical Review 107 (2):298-300 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Deontic logic ought to be fundamental to ethical theory and the theory of practical reasoning, but, for various reasons, it hasn’t been. James Forrester faults the standard systems themselves; so, in place of standard deontic logic, he proposes a new deontic logic that should, he thinks, serve moral philosophy more adequately.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The problem of logical constants.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):1-37.
Logic and Truth.Ken Akiba - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:101-123.
A logic of good, should, and would.Lou Goble - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (2):253 - 276.
Logical Rules and the a priori: Good and Bad Questions.Jaroslav Peregrin - 2007 - In Jean-Yves Béziau & Alexandre Costa-Leite (eds.), Perspectives on Universal Logic. pp. 111--122.
The Carpenter and the Good.Rachel Barney - 2007 - In Douglas Cairns, Fritz-Gregor Herrmann & Terrence Penner (eds.), Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato's Republic. University of Edinburgh. pp. 293-319.
Criteria of rationality and the problem of logical sloth.Andre Kukla - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (3):486-490.
The T-schema is not a logical truth.R. T. Cook - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):231-239.
Benefit and harm.T. M. Benditt - 1976 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (1):116-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
25 (#618,847)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references