A Normative Conception of Coherence for a Discursive Theory of Legal Justification

Ratio Juris 2 (2):155-166 (1989)

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,805

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
55 (#210,433)

6 months
1 (#386,031)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Klaus Günther
Goethe University Frankfurt

Citations of this work

Equality and Singularity in Justification and Application Discourses.Matthias Fritsch - 2010 - European Journal of Political Theory 9 (3):328-346.
Introduction: Law in Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action.Mathieu Deflem - 1994 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 20 (4):1-20.
Habermas, Modernity and Law: A Bibliography.Mathieu Deflem - 1994 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 20 (4):151-166.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Legal Justification by Optimal Coherence.Amalia Amaya - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (3):304-329.
The Role of Coherence in Legal Reasoning.Barbara Baum Levenbook - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):355 - 374.
Formal Models of Coherence and Legal Epistemology.Amalia Amaya - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (4):429-447.
Coherence and Explanations.Thomas Bartelborth - 1999 - Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):209-224.
The Incoherence of Coherence Theories.Richard Fumerton - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:89-102.
Habermas and Kant: Judgement and Communicative Experience.Ståle R. S. Finke - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):21-45.
Fumerton on Coherence Theories.Laurence Bonjour - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:103-108.
Probability and Coherence Justification.Michael Huemer - 1997 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):463-472.
Coherentism.Peter Murphy - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.