The Problem Is Not Professional Publishing, But the Publish-or-Perish Culture

Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (2):617-619 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The publication of scientific papers has become increasingly problematic in the last decades. Even if we agree that a renewed model is needed for peer-reviewed scientific publication, we think the problem does not essentially lie in professional publishing—with economic incentives—but in the publish-or-perish culture that dominates the lives of researchers and academics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Publish or Perish.Benjamin Davies & Giulia Felappi - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (5):745-761.
Optimal Publishing Strategies.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2009 - Episteme 6 (2):185-199.
What’s Behind the Hyphen? A Response to Publish Yet Perish.Herner Saeverot - 2014 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (6):673-677.
Editorial Board Self-Publishing Rates in Czech Economic Journals.Radek Zdeněk - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2):669-682.
Publish and perish.Jos De Mul - 2005 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 67 (3):417-434.
Publish and perish.Djaimilia Pereira de Almeida - 2016 - Common Knowledge 22 (2):178-180.
Guidebook for Publishing Philosophy, 1997 Edition.[author unknown] - forthcoming - Book.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-19

Downloads
20 (#703,484)

6 months
12 (#157,869)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?