Autonomy in medical ethics after O'Neill

Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):127-130 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Next SectionFollowing the influential Gifford and Reith lectures by Onora O’Neill, this paper explores further the paradigm of individual autonomy which has been so dominant in bioethics until recently and concurs that it is an aberrant application and that conceptions of individual autonomy cannot provide a sufficient and convincing starting point for ethics within medical practice. We suggest that revision of the operational definition of patient autonomy is required for the twenty first century. We follow O’Neill in recommending a principled version of patient autonomy, which for us involves the provision of sufficient and understandable information and space for patients, who have the capacity to make a settled choice about medical interventions on themselves, to do so responsibly in a manner considerate to others. We test it against the patient–doctor relationship in which each fully respects the autonomy of the other based on an unspoken covenant and bilateral trust between the doctor and patient. Indeed we consider that the dominance of the individual autonomy paradigm harmed that relationship. Although it seems to eliminate any residue of medical paternalism we suggest that it has tended to replace it with an equally (or possibly even more) unacceptable bioethical paternalism. In addition it may, for example, lead some doctors to consider mistakenly that unthinking acquiescence to a requested intervention against their clinical judgement is honouring “patient autonomy” when it is, in fact, abrogation of their duty as doctors



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,703

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is respect for autonomy defensible?James Wilson - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (6):353-356.
Paternalism and partial autonomy.O. O'Neill - 1984 - Journal of Medical Ethics 10 (4):173-178.
Autonomy, consent and the law.Sheila McLean - 2010 - New York, N.Y.: Routledge-Cavendish.
Medical and scientific uses of human tissue.O. O'Neill - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (1):5-7.
Autonomy, respect for autonomy and weakness of will.R. Gillon - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (4):195-196.
The Inaugural Address: Autonomy: The Emperor's New Clothes.Onora O'Neill - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):1 - 21.
Limits of Autonomy in Biomedical Ethics? Conceptual Clarifications.Theda Rehbock - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (4):524-532.
The medical exception: Physicians, euthanasia and the dutch criminal law.Jos V. M. Welie - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):419-437.
Some limits of informed consent.O. O'Neill - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (1):4-7.
Promoting patient autonomy: Looking back.Gene H. Stollerman - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).


Added to PP

96 (#162,969)

6 months
4 (#313,042)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Consent and end of life decisions.J. Harris - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (1):10-15.
Autonomy and the subjective character of experience.Kim Atkins - 2000 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):71–79.
Autonomy and the Subjective Character of Experience.Kim Atkins - 2003 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):71-79.

Add more references