Formal statement of the special principle of relativity

Synthese 192 (7):1-24 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While there is a longstanding discussion about the interpretation of the extended, general principle of relativity, there seems to be a consensus that the special principle of relativity is absolutely clear and unproblematic. However, a closer look at the literature on relativistic physics reveals a more confusing picture. There is a huge variety of, sometimes metaphoric, formulations of the relativity principle, and there are different, sometimes controversial, views on its actual content. The aim of this paper is to develop a precise language in order to provide a precise formulation of the principle. In view of the fact that the special relativity principle is considered as a universal meta-law, which must be valid for all physical laws in all situations, we try to keep the formalism as general as possible. The benefit of the formal reconstruction is that it makes explicit all the necessary conceptual components of the principle; it brings out many subtle details and the related conceptual problems

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Foundation of the Principle of Relativity.Øyvind Grøn & Kjell Vøyenli - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (11):1695-1733.
Is General Relativity Generally Relativistic?Roger Jones - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 381.
On the meaning of Lorentz covariance.László E. Szabó - 2003 - Foundations Of Physics Letters 17:479-496.
Spatial Directions, Anisotropy and Special Relativity.Marco Mamone Capria - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (8):1375-1397.
Clocks and the Equivalence Principle.Ronald R. Hatch - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (11):1725-1739.
Tachyons and causal paradoxes.J. B. Maund - 1979 - Foundations of Physics 9 (7-8):557-574.
A new approach to the theory of relativity.L. Jánossy - 1970 - Foundations of Physics 1 (2):111-131.
Are probabilism and special relativity compatible?Nicholas Maxwell - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
Covariance, invariance, and the equivalence of frames.J. Earman - 1974 - Foundations of Physics 4 (2):267-289.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-05

Downloads
120 (#146,180)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?