Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):199-208 (2004)
Abstract |
Respect for human embryos is often defended on the basis of the potentiality argument: embryos deserve respect because they already possess potentially the features that in adults are fully actualized. Opponents of this argument challenge it by claiming that if embryos should be respected because they are potentially adults, then gametes should be respected because they are potentially embryos. This article rejects this reductio ad absurdum argument by showing that there are two different types of potentiality involved so that the transitivity of potentiality does not hold up in this case. Respect for embryos does not logically entail respect for gametes.
|
Keywords | Philosophy Philosophy Ethics Philosophy of Medicine General Surgery History of Medicine |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1023/B:META.0000040038.52317.08 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Argument From Potentiality in the Embryo Protection Debate: Finally “Depotentialized”?Marco Stier & Bettina Schoene-Seifert - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):19-27.
Phenomenology of Pregnancy and the Ethics of Abortion.Fredrik Svenaeus - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (1):77-87.
On Potentiality and Respect for Embryos: A Reply to Mary Mahowald.Alfonso Gómez-Lobo - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (2):105-110.
A Heideggerian Defense of Therapeutic Cloning.Fredrik Svenaeus - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (1):31-62.
Taking Precautionary Concerns Seriously: A Defense of a Misused Anti-Abortion Argument.Henrik Friberg-Fernros - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (3):228-247.
View all 14 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
“More on Respect for Embryos and Potentiality: Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for in Vitro Embryos?”.Stephen S. Hanson - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):215-226.
Respect for Embryos and the Potentiality Argument.Mary B. Mahowald - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):209-214.
Saving Seven Embryos or Saving One Child? Michael Sandel on the Moral Status of Human Embryos.Gregor Damschen & Dieter Schönecker - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Ethics and the Life Sciences):239-245.
Contested Commodities at Both Ends of Life: Buying and Selling Gametes, Embryos, and Body Tissues.Suzanne Holland - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (3):263-284.
Frozen Embryos, Genetic Information and Reproductive Rights.Sarah Chan & Muireann Quigley - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (8):439–448.
Do Embryos Have Interests?: Why Embryos Are Identical to Future Persons but Not Harmed by Death.Aaron Simmons - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):57-66.
On Potentiality and Respect for Embryos: A Reply to Mary Mahowald.Alfonso Gómez-Lobo - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (2):105-110.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
76 ( #153,687 of 2,519,575 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,575 )
2009-01-28
Total views
76 ( #153,687 of 2,519,575 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,153 of 2,519,575 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads