In (2001)

Intellectual Impostures seeks to raise the stakes even further, thus constituting a kind of culmination of Alan Sokal’s initial project. This chapter argues that restricted to showing why Sokal and Jean Bricmont fail to make a case against Jacques Lacan not only on the basis of generally accepted standards of intellectual integrity but also on the basis of standards of their own choosing. It aims to move from questions of style to objections more firmly grounded on issues of substance, by which is meant Lacan’s knowledge and use of mathematical science on the one hand, and the alleged irrelevance of Lacan’s mathematics to psychoanalysis on the other. Lacanians would want to insist that only something as simple as a basic ignorance of Lacan’s work can serve to explain the appearance of the mathematical concepts as enigmatic. In direct contrast with the work of Lacan Intellectual Impostures makes easy, even entertaining, reading.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Of Structure as an Inmixing of an Otherness Prerequisite to Any Subject Whatever.Jacques Lacan - 1970 - In Richard Macksey & Eugenio Donato (eds.), The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 186--200.
Lacan and the Political.Yannis Stavrakakis - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (3):603-604.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,183,741 of 2,463,127 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,363 of 2,463,127 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes