Disaster issues in non-utilitarian consequentialism (ethics of social consequences)1

Human Affairs 26 (1):52-62 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ethics of social consequences is a means of satisficing non-utilitarian consequentialism that can be used to approach disaster issues. The primary values in the ethics of social consequences are humanity, human dignity and moral rights, and these are developed and realized to achieve positive social consequences. The secondary values found in the ethics of social consequences include justice, responsibility, moral duty and tolerance. Their role and purpose is given by their ability to help achieve and realize moral good. Fair treatment within moral issues stems from applying primary as well as secondary values. The nature of these values cannot be determined exclusively in ordinary circumstances. However, in extraordinary circumstances, not all the requirements relating to the value structure of the ethics of social consequences need be considered in its entirety. In extraordinary circumstances, values are prioritised and realized. Primary values are realized prior to secondary ones. When prioritizing primary values, the realization of positive social consequences, or at least minimizing the negative social consequences, takes priority over other primary values. In disaster bioethics especially, it is often necessary to find a way to minimize the negative social consequences; thus, actions where positive social consequences are prevalent are preferred.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human Dignity and Non-Utilitarian Consequentialist "Ethics of Social Consequences".Vasil Gluchman - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1 (7):159-165.
Spinozian consequentialism of ethics of social consequences.Michaela Petrufová Joppová - 2018 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 8 (1-2):41-50.
Ethics of Social Consequences – Methodology of Bioethics Education.Vasil Gluchman - 2012 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 2 (1-2):16-27.
Ethics of Social Consequences as a Contemporary Consequentialist Theory.Ján Kalajtzidis - 2013 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 3 (3-4):159-171.
Non-utilitarian Consequentialism and its Application in the Ethics of Teaching.Marta Gluchmanova - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 37:67-75.
Humanity and Moral Rights.Vasil Gluchman - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:15-20.
Human Dignity and its Non-Utilitarian Consequentialist Aspects.Vasil Gluchman - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:127-133.
G. E. Moore and theory of moral/right action in ethics of social consequences.Vasil Gluchman - 2017 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 7 (1-2):57-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-10

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vasil Gluchman
Comenius University In Bratislava (Doctorate)

References found in this work

Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984.Amartya Sen - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):169-221.
Rights and agency.Amartya Sen - 1982 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 11 (1):3-39.
Utilitarianism and welfarism.Amartya Sen - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (9):463-489.
Consequentialism.Philip Pettit - 1991 - Dartmouth Publishing Company.

View all 19 references / Add more references