Changing Funding Arrangements and the Production of Scientific Knowledge: Introduction to the Special Issue
Minerva 56 (1):1-10 (2018)
Abstract
With this special issue, we would like to promote research on changes in the funding of the sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Since funding secures the livelihood of researchers and the means to do research, it is an indispensable condition for almost all research; as funding arrangements are undergoing dramatic changes, we think it timely to renew the science studies community’s efforts to understand the funding of research. Changes in the governance of science have garnered considerable attention from science studies and higher education research; however, the impact of these changes on the conduct and content of research has not received sufficient attention, and theoretical insights into the connections between funding practices and research practices are few and far between. The aim of this special issue is to contribute to our theoretical understanding of the changing nature of research funding and its impact on the production of scientific knowledge. More specifically, we are interested in the interplay between funding and research practices: What is the impact of institutionalised funding arrangements on the production of scientific knowledge?My notes
Similar books and articles
The Drawbacks of Project Funding for Epistemic Innovation: Comparing Institutional Affordances and Constraints of Different Types of Research Funding.Thomas Franssen, Wout Scholten, Laurens K. Hessels & Sarah de Rijcke - 2018 - Minerva 56 (1):11-33.
The Impact of Changing Funding and Authority Relationships on Scientific Innovations.Richard Whitley, Jochen Gläser & Grit Laudel - 2018 - Minerva 56 (1):109-134.
Research Funding and the Value-Dependence of Science.Wade L. Robison - 1992 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 11 (1):33-50.
At Arm’s Length? Applied Social Science and its Sponsors.Heidi Kjærnet - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (3):161-169.
The Place of Crowdfunding in the Discovery of Scientific and Social Value of Medical Research.Lorenzo del Savio - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (5):384-392.
Transformative science: a new index and the impact of non-funding, private funding, and public funding.Barrett R. Anderson & Gregory J. Feist - 2017 - Social Epistemology 31 (2):130-151.
Funding, objectivity and the socialization of medical research.James Robert Brown - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):295--308.
Do Financial Conflicts of Interest Bias Research?: An Inquiry into the “Funding Effect” Hypothesis.Sheldon Krimsky - 2012 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 38 (4):566-587.
Barking up the wrong tree? Industry funding of academic research: A case study with commentaries.Brian Schrag, Gloria Ferrell, Vivian Weil, Tristan J. Fiedler, Gloria Ferrell, Vivian Weil & Tristan J. Fiedler - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):569-582.
The State is an Enemy of Science: A Review of Terence Kealey's The Economic Laws of Scientific Research. [REVIEW]Kris Borer - 2012 - Libertarian Papers 4.
Ethical issues in funding orphan drug research and development.C. A. Gericke - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):164-168.
Nonneutralities in Science Funding: Direction, Destabilization, and Distortion.Thomas J. McQuade & William N. Butos - 2012 - Journal des Economistes Et des Etudes Humaines 18 (1).
The Rise of Computing Research in East Africa: The Relationship Between Funding, Capacity and Research Community in a Nascent Field.Matthew Harsh, Ravtosh Bal, Jameson Wetmore, G. Pascal Zachary & Kerry Holden - 2018 - Minerva 56 (1):35-58.
Researcher Views About Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest in Nanotechnology.Katherine A. McComas - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):699-717.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-01-29
Downloads
20 (#565,488)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
2018-01-29
Downloads
20 (#565,488)
6 months
1 (#449,844)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Constructivism: Social Discourse & Knowledge.Jesús Aparicio de Soto - 2022 - Scientific Research, an Academic Publisher (OJPP) 12 (3):376-396.
Academic Habitus and Institutional Change: Comparing Two Generations of German Scholars.Hildegard Matthies & Marc Torka - 2019 - Minerva 57 (3):345-371.
Should we fund research randomly? An epistemological criticism of the lottery model as an alternative to peer-review for the funding of science.Baptiste Bedessem - forthcoming - Research Evaluation.
Two conceptions of the sources of conservatism in scientific research.Baptiste Bedessem - 2019 - Synthese 198 (7):1-18.
Cross-Sectoral Mobility Funding and the Challenge of Immersion: The Case of SSH.Tomas Hellström & Christina Hellström - 2020 - Minerva 58 (3):389-407.
References found in this work
Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting.David J. Hess, Gwen Ottinger, Joanna Kempner, Jeff Howard, Sahra Gibbon & Scott Frickel - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (4):444-473.
Do Financial Conflicts of Interest Bias Research?: An Inquiry into the “Funding Effect” Hypothesis.Sheldon Krimsky - 2012 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 38 (4):566-587.
Equity and Excellence in Research Funding.Diana Hicks & J. Sylvan Katz - 2011 - Minerva 49 (2):137-151.
Science Policy in Action: Policy and the Researcher. [REVIEW]Norma Morris - 2000 - Minerva 38 (4):425-451.