Philosophia 49 (2):651-665 (2020)

Abstract
It is argued that George Berkeley’s term ‘common sense’ does not indicate shared conviction, but the shared capacity of reasonable judgement, and is therefore to be classed as a mental ability, not a belief-system. Common sense is to be distinguished from theoretical understanding which, in Berkeley’s view, is frequently corrupted either by learned prejudice, or by language that lacks meaning or camouflages contradiction. It is also to be distinguished from the deliverances of divine revelation, which—however enlightening Berkeley supposed them to be—are not necessarily available to all people. This interpretation of common sense is supported both by attention to Berkeley’s own texts, including his sermons, letters and philosophical writings, and by attention to the views of John Locke and René Descartes, who also understand ‘common sense’ as susceptibility to the ‘natural light’. In addition, this interpretation renders Berkeley’s appeal to common sense in support of his immaterialism a straightforward appeal to the reader’s native reason. No longer, then, are we forced to see Berkeley as improbably maintaining that the denial of matter is really the view of ‘the common people’, but rather that those who have least attachment to theory and doctrine will be best able to grasp the case for immaterialism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2021
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-020-00238-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Berkeley's Thought.George S. Pappas - 2018 - Cornell University Press.
Berkeley: An Interpretation.Kenneth P. Winkler - 1989 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Common Sense and Berkeley's Perception by Suggestion.Jody Graham - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):397 – 423.
Immaterialism and Common Sense.S. Seth Bordner - 2017 - In Bertil Belfrage & Richard Brook (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Berkeley. London: Bloomsbury. pp. 343-354.
Berkeley: A Portrait.Damian Ilodigwe - 2010 - New Castle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Berkeley: Inconsistencies and Common Sense.Russell A. Lascola - 1984 - Idealistic Studies 14 (3):193-199.
How Berkeley's Gardener Knows His Cherry Tree.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):553-576.
Reid and Berkeley on Scepticism, Representationalism, and Ideas.Peter West - 2019 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 17 (3):191-210.
Common Sense.Michael De Medeiros - 2009 - Weigl Publishers.
Reid’s Conception of Common Sense.James Somerville - 1987 - The Monist 70 (4):418-429.
Byl Berkeley skutečně imaterialista?Martin Kovář - 2014 - Studia Philosophica 61 (2):77-90.
Berkeley’s Thought. [REVIEW]Lex Newman - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (2):314-318.
Berkeley’s Thought. [REVIEW]Lex Newman - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (2):314-318.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-08-07

Total views
11 ( #855,883 of 2,519,622 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #166,923 of 2,519,622 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes