Complexity, Not Severity: Reinterpreting the Sliding Scale of Capacity

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (31):506–517 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, we focus on the definition and application of the sliding scale of capacity. We show that the current interpretations of the sliding scale confound distinct features of the medical decision, such as its urgency, its severity, or its complexity, that do not always covary.We propose that the threshold for assessing capacity should be adjusted based solely on the cognitive complexity of the decision at hand. We further suggest that the complexity of a decision should be identified based on a patient’s particular cognitive deficits. We utilize the current research on the types of deficits that characterize amnestic dementias and examine which types of medical decisions might be most complex for patients with that type of dementia. We conclude that applying the sliding scale based on individualized judgments of cognitive complexity will improve accuracy of assessment of capacity and enable capable patients to participate in medical decision making.

Similar books and articles

The sliding scales of repentance.Martha Sylvia Cheng - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (2):157-171.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-19

Downloads
297 (#65,628)

6 months
124 (#27,889)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nada Gligorov
Albany Medical College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references