The S-R reinforcement theory of extinction

, &
Psychological Review 61 (1):23-33 (1954)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0062623

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Resistance to extinction as a function of percentage of reinforcement, number of training trials, and conditioned reinforcement.Norman Kass & Helen Wilson - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):355.
Extinction as a function of the spacing of extinction trials.Walter C. Stanley - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (4):249.
Extinction following partial and continuous primary and secondary reinforcement.Nancy A. Myers - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (3):172.
Extinction as a function of the order of partial and consistent reinforcement.N. S. Sutherland, N. J. Mackintosh & J. B. Wolfe - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1):56.
Resistance to extinction when partial reinforcement is followed by regular reinforcement.Herbert M. Jenkins - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (5):441.
Durability of persistence as a function of number of partially reinforced trials.Kenneth L. Traupmann, Paul T. Wong & Abram Amsel - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (3):372.
Resistance to extinction and the pattern of reinforcement. I. Alternation of reinforcement and the conditioned eyelid response. [REVIEW]David A. Grant, Arthur J. Riopelle & Harold W. Hake - 1950 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1):53.
Influence of a small number of partial reinforcement training trials on resistance to extinction.E. J. Capaldi & Dick Hart - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (2):166.
Resistance to extinction when continuous reinforcement is followed by partial reinforcement.David Hothersall - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (1):109.
Effects of amount and percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials on conditioning and extinction.Allan R. Wagner - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (3):234.
Within-subject partial reinforcement effects: Differential extinction following nondifferential percentage of reinforcement in acquisition.Dennis G. Dyck, Roger L. Mellgren & Jeffrey A. Seybert - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (3):391.
Extinction in a runway as a function of acquisition level and reinforcement percentage.Winfred F. Hill & Norman E. Spear - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (5):495.
The effect of continuous, partial, and varied magnitude reinforcement on acquisition and extinction.Harry G. Yamaguchi - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (4):319.
Resistance to extinction as a function of the discrimination habit established during fixed-ratio reinforcement.M. Ray Denny, Ruth H. Wells & Jack L. Maatsch - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (6):451.
Positive and negative partial-reinforcement extinction effects carried through continuous reinforcement, changed motivation, and changed response.Robert R. Ross - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (5):492.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
17 (#819,600)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The conditioning model of neurosis.H. J. Eysenck - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):155-166.
The nonextinction of fear: operation bootstrap.Robert C. Bolles - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):167-168.

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references