Eating Meat and Reading Diamond

Philosophical Papers 37 (1):157-175 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Here is a very common philosophical opinion: being human plays no important role in moral thinking. Call this the anti-humanist thesis. I argue that a thirty-year old paper by Cora Diamond, ‘Eating Meat and Eating People' (‘EMEP') can help us to see that the anti-humanist thesis is false

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Five Arguments for Vegetarianism.William O. Stephens - 1994 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (4):25-39.
Eating Meat and Eating People.Cora Diamond - 1978 - Philosophy 53 (206):465 - 479.
Vegetarianism, Traditional Morality, and Moral Conservatism.David Detmer - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (9999):39-48.
Moderation, morals, and meat.Frederick Ferré - 1986 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (1-4):391-406.
Puppies, pigs, and people: Eating meat and marginal cases.Alastair Norcross - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):229–245.
The puzzle of pure moral deference.Sarah McGrath - 2009 - Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):321-344.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-27

Downloads
171 (#116,202)

6 months
18 (#152,495)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Gleeson
Flinders University

Citations of this work

Basic Equality.Paul Sagar - 2024 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cognitive disability and moral status.David Wasserman - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Is the argument from marginal cases obtuse?Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):223–232.

Add more references