Spatial anticipatory attentional bias for threat: Reliable individual differences with RT-based online measurement

&
Consciousness and Cognition 81:102930 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.concog.2020.102930

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Thinking high but feeling low: An exploratory cluster analysis investigating how implicit and explicit spider fear co-vary.Allison J. Ouimet, Nancy Bahl & Adam S. Radomsky - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (7):1333-1344.
Does anxiety-linked attentional bias to threatening information reflect bias in the setting of attentional goals, or bias in the execution of attentional goals?Julian Basanovic & Colin MacLeod - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (3).
Cognitive effects of attentional training depend on attentional control.Joanna Kłosowska, Agata Blaut & Borysław Paulewicz - 2012 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 43 (4):272-277.
Temporal dynamics of anxiety-related attentional bias: is affective context a missing piece of the puzzle?Jolene A. Cox, Bruce K. Christensen & Stephanie C. Goodhew - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (6):1329-1338.
Attentional bias during emotional processing: evidence from an emotional flanker task using IAPS.Mario A. Parra, Manuel Guillermo Sánchez, Stella Valencia & Natalia Trujillo - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (2):275-285.
Reliability and validity of measures of attentional bias towards threat in unselected student samples: seek, but will you find?Bram Van Bockstaele, Luuk Lamens, Elske Salemink, Reinout W. Wiers, Susan M. Bögels & Kyriaki Nikolaou - 2019 - Cognition and Emotion 34 (2):217-228.
Individual differences in change blindness.Katharina Verena Bergmann - unknown
ERP correlates of attentional processing in spider fear: evidence of threat-specific hypervigilance.Rebecca Venetacci, Amber Johnstone, Kenneth C. Kirkby & Allison Matthews - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (3):437-449.
Individual differences in visual and auditory processing of emotional material.Małgorzata Fajkowska & Anna Zagórska - 2015 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 46 (2):174-180.
Limited generalisation of changes in attentional bias following attentional bias modification with the visual probe task.Bram Van Bockstaele, Elske Salemink, Susan M. Bögels & Reinout W. Wiers - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (2).
The effectiveness of touchscreen-based attentional bias modification to thin body stimuli on state rumination.Laura Dondzilo, Elizabeth Rieger, Rebecca Shao & Jason Bell - 2020 - Cognition and Emotion 34 (5):1052-1058.
Threat bias, not negativity bias, underpins differences in political ideology.Scott O. Lilienfeld & Robert D. Latzman - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):318-319.
Explaining ideology: Two factors are better than one.Philip Robbins & Kenneth Shields - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):326-328.
The time course of attentional bias to cues of threat and safety.Lisette J. Schmidt, Artem V. Belopolsky & Jan Theeuwes - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 31 (5).
Anxiety sensitivity: The role of conscious awareness and selective attentional bias to physical threat.Caroline Hunt, Edmund Keogh & Christopher C. French - 2006 - Emotion 6 (3):418-428.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-17

Downloads
14 (#934,671)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references