In Defense of a Four-part Theory: Replies to Hardimon, Haslanger, Mallon, and Zack

Symposia on Gender, Race, and Philosophy 5 (2):1-18 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Replies to Michael Hardimon, Sally Haslanger, Ron Mallon, and Naomi Zack's critical commentaries on Joshua Glasgow's book, A Theory of Race.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-20

Downloads
115 (#143,451)

6 months
7 (#175,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua Glasgow
Sonoma State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Against Arguments from Reference.Ron Mallon, Edouard Machery, Shaun Nichols & Stephen Stich - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):332 - 356.

View all 19 references / Add more references