Expert Assistance in Security Politics: Problems and Possibilities

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 64 (6):33-54 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article examines the problem of correlation between the “knowledge society” and “knowledge practice,” based on analysis of the phenomenon of security expertise as a part of political expertise. In the article, we consider the relationship between politics and security and demonstrate under what circumstances security becomes politics. It is noted that at present the concept of security has become very multifaceted and includes various spheres, from military-political to informational and humanitarian. We defines security expertise, list its key parameters, origin, its institutionalization and practices. Special attention is paid to the characteristics of the main schools in the study of security expertise problems. Their general ideology and inherent problems are analyzed, including the correspondence of the quality of the expertise to recognized standards of scientific knowledge. We explain why security issues appeal to experts and result in numerous studies. We raise an issue of causes that may lead to possible deprofessionalization of security expertise. We identify a number of institutions with an expert status in the field of security and explain the global growth of analytical centers specializing in security expertise. A brief description of such analytical centers and their main features is given. We look into examples of practical impact of expertise on political decision-making, and possible mechanisms of expert support. It is concluded that expert analysis can exercise direct impact on political processes, and the experts become influential shadow participants. On the one hand, this may contribute to adopting more balanced decisions, but, on the other hand, it may result in deprofessionalization of experts who will try to adjust to the demands of politicians. Thus, in the sphere of security expertise, one of the results of the formation of a “knowledge society” is a decrease in the autonomy of the scientific sphere, which has a side effect in the form of deprofessionalization of knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction to "The Politics of Expertise".Stephen Turner - 2013 - In Stephen P. Turner (ed.), The Politics of Expertise. New York, USA: Routledge.
The Transhuman Security Dilemma.Daniel McIntosh - 2010 - Journal of Evolution and Technology 21 (2):32-48.
The Politics of Local Security Policy. Ideas for a Sociological Analysis.D’Albergo Ernesto - 2017 - Governare la Paura. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 10 (1).
How Politics Deals with Expert Dissent: The Case of Ethics Councils.Wolfgang Menz & Alexander Bogner - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (6):888-914.
De politieke filosofie van zekerheid.Josette Daemen - 2020 - Socialisme and Democratie 77 (2):65-71.
An expert system for men genital problems diagnosis and treatment.Samy S. Abu Naser & Mones M. Al-Hanjori - 2016 - International Journal of Medicine Research 1 (2):83--86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-16

Downloads
9 (#1,224,450)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references