Analytical Examination of Hume’s Standpoint about the Laws of Nature

Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 8 (31-32):278-293 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We always have a close interaction with systematic nature. Most of our behaviors, plannings, predictions, as well as our ideas and beliefs are due to the fact that we consider nature as controlled by the laws. Since the laws of nature are the main keys of human sciences, analysis and explanation of these laws were a part of the research of many great philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Ibn Sina, Hume, Mullah Sadra and Kant. In this paper, while referring to some theories about the laws of nature, the author deals particularly with Hume’s standpoint, which is well-known as the viewpoint of “orderliness”; and then, he criticized it through distinguishing between perpetual propositions and necessary propositions. Keywords

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Causation and Explanation.Stathis Psillos - 2002 - McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP.
Laws of nature.Norman Swartz - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW]Richard Otte - 2005 - Hume Studies 31 (1):165-168.
Are Conservation Laws Metaphysically Necessary?Johanna Wolff - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):898-906.
The Argument from Laws of Nature Reassessed.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to Dna. Cambridge University Press.
Laws in Biology and the Unity of Nature.Angela Breitenbach - 2017 - In Michela Massimi & Angela Breitenbach (eds.), Kant and the Laws of Nature. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 237-255.
Nailed to Hume's cross?John W. Carroll - 2008 - In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell. pp. 67--81.
Against Miracles as Law-Violations: A Neo-Aristotelian Approach.Archer Joel - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (4):83--98.
Laws in Physics.Mathias Frisch - 2014 - European Review 22:S33-S49.
Laws of nature.John W. Carroll - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Miracles and Laws of Nature: E. J. LOWE.E. J. Lowe - 1987 - Religious Studies 23 (2):263-278.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-24

Downloads
33 (#457,286)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references