Blowing up the power of a singular cardinal

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 80 (1):17-33 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/0168-0072(95)00046-1

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Blowing up power of a singular cardinal—wider gaps.Moti Gitik - 2002 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 116 (1-3):1-38.
On models with power-like ordering.Saharon Shelah - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (2):247-267.
Blowing up the power set of the least measurable.Arthur W. Apter & James Cummings - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (3):915-923.
Approachability at the Second Successor of a Singular Cardinal.Moti Gitik & John Krueger - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (4):1211 - 1224.
M. Gitik Blowing up power of a singular cardinalYwider gaps 1 D. Pitteloud Algebraic properties of rings of generalized power series 39.I. Neeman, D. M. Evans, M. Menni, R. D. Schindler, K. Ho & F. Stephan - 2002 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 116 (1):3-15.
The negation of the singular cardinal hypothesis from o(K)=K++.Moti Gitik - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 43 (3):209-234.
The negation of the singular cardinal hypothesis from< i> o(< i> K_)=< i> K< sup>++.Moti Gitik - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 43 (3):209-234.
Extender based forcings.Moti Gitik & Menachem Magidor - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (2):445-460.
The strenght of the failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis.Moti Gitik - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 51 (3):215-240.
A remark on the tree property in a choiceless context.Arthur W. Apter - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (5-6):585-590.
Review: Moti Gitik, The Strength of the Failure of the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis. [REVIEW]James Cummings - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):340-340.
Review: Moti Gitik, Menachem Magidor, The Singular Cardinal Hypothesis Revisited. [REVIEW]James Cummings - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):339-340.
Indiscernible sequences for extenders, and the singular cardinal hypothesis.Moti Gitik & William J. Mitchell - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 82 (3):273-316.
The tree property and the failure of SCH at uncountable cofinality.Dima Sinapova - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):553-562.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
13 (#1,006,512)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Aronszajn trees and failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis.Itay Neeman - 2009 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):139-157.
Blowing up power of a singular cardinal—wider gaps.Moti Gitik - 2002 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 116 (1-3):1-38.
Sigma-Prikry forcing II: Iteration Scheme.Alejandro Poveda, Assaf Rinot & Dima Sinapova - 2022 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 22 (3):2150019.
No bound for the first fixed point.Moti Gitik - 2005 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 5 (02):193-246.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Extender based forcings.Moti Gitik & Menachem Magidor - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (2):445-460.
On hidden extenders.Moti Gitik - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):349-369.

Add more references