Münster, Germany: mentis (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This study seeks to contribute to the current debate in literary studies, philosophy, and the history of science about knowledge’s forms of representation and the “knowledge of literature,” while in two respects also going beyond the debate. First, it shows how and why the demand for an alternative non-scientific form of knowledge mediated by literature becomes widespread within a particular constellation in the history of ideas. In particular, it situates this phenomenon within the philosophy of life (Lebensphilosophie) and the so-called philosophy of world views (Weltanschauungsphilosophie) from 1870 to 1930, as well as in the works of Robert Musil. Second, the study shifts the focus of the debate. In this thesis, the focus is not on the question, often discussed with unsatisfactory results, as to whether or not literature in general can convey knowledge. Instead, it asks in which concrete circumstances a specific work of literature conveys knowledge. The conditions in which this is the case — formulated using concepts and insights from analytic philosophy — in amalgamate allow for a clear analysis of Musil's attempts to communicate a “living knowledge” by means of his literary works.
|
Keywords | literature and philosophy ethical knowledge epistemic contextualism historical epistemology thought experiments intuition philosophy of life knowing-how knowing-what-it-is-like knowledge-by-acquaintance |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy this book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dispositional Knowledge-How Versus Propositional Knowledge-That.Gregor Damschen - 2009 - In Gregor Damschen, Robert Schnepf & Karsten Stueber (eds.), Debating Dispositions. Issues in Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Mind. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. pp. 278-295.
Robert Musil o las dificultades actuales de una vida ética.Juan Cruz Revueltas - 2000 - Signos Filosóficos 2:11-32.
Grillparzer Und Musil Studien Zu Einer Sprachstilgeschichte Österreichischer Literatur.Christoph Leitgeb, Richard Reichensperger & Walter Weiss - 2000
Literature and Truthfulness.Gregory Currie - 2012 - In James Maclaurin (ed.), Rationis Defensor. pp. 23-31.
Knowing How and Epistemic Injustice.Katherine Hawley - 2011 - In John Bengson & Marc A. Moffett (eds.), Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action. Oxford University Press. pp. 283-99.
Why Epistemic Contextualism Does Not Provide an Adequate Account of Knowledge: Comments on Barke.Frank Hofmann - 2004 - Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):375-382.
What Mary Didn't Read: On Literary Narratives and Knowledge.László Kajtár - 2016 - Ratio 29 (3):327-343.
Contextualism and Knowledge Norms.Alex Worsnip - 2017 - In Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism. Routledge. pp. 177-189.
Literature and Knowledge. A New Version of an Old Story.Bogdan Creţu - 2011 - Logos and Episteme 2 (1):7-19.
Eternal Life as Knowledge of God: An Epistemology of Knowledge by Acquaintance and Spiritual Formation.Brandon L. Rickabaugh - 2013 - Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care 6 (2):204-228.
Knowing That, Knowing How, and Knowing to Do.Refeng Tang - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):426-442.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-11-09
Total views
29 ( #392,105 of 2,499,295 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,670 of 2,499,295 )
2017-11-09
Total views
29 ( #392,105 of 2,499,295 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,670 of 2,499,295 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads