‘Physics is a kind of metaphysics’: Émile Meyerson and Einstein’s late rationalistic realism

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (3):783-829 ()
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gerald Holton has famously described Einstein’s career as a philosophical “pilgrimage”. Starting on “the historic ground” of Machian positivism and phenomenalism, following the completion of general relativity in late 1915, Einstein’s philosophy endured (a) a speculative turn: physical theorizing appears as ultimately a “pure mathematical construction” guided by faith in the simplicity of nature and (b) a realistic turn: science is “nothing more than a refinement ”of the everyday belief in the existence of mind-independent physical reality. Nevertheless, Einstein’s mathematical constructivism that supports his unified field theory program appears to be, at first sight, hardly compatible with the common sense realism with which he countered quantum theory. Thus, literature on Einstein’s philosophy of science has often struggled in finding the thread between ostensibly conflicting philosophical pronouncements. This paper supports the claim that Einstein’s dialog with Émile Meyerson from the mid 1920s till the early 1930s might be a neglected source to solve this riddle. According to Einstein, Meyerson shared (a) his belief in the independent existence of an external world and (b) his conviction that the latter can be grasped only by speculative means. Einstein could present his search for a unified field theory as a metaphysical-realistic program opposed to the positivistic-operationalist spirit of quantum mechanics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Einstein and the Laws of Physics.Friedel Weinert - 2007 - Physics and Philosophy.
Einstein's unification.Jeroen van Dongen - 2010 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory.Arthur Fine - 1986 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bohr, Einstein and Realism.Wojciech Daniel - 1989 - Dialectica 43 (3):249-261.
Einstein's Role in the Creation of Relativistic Cosmology.Chris Smeenk - 2014 - In Michel Janssen & Christoph Lehner (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Einstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 228-269.
Identity versus determinism: Émile Meyerson׳s neo-Kantian interpretation of the quantum theory.M. Anthony Mills - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 47:33-49.
Einstein's struggle for a Machian gravitation theory.Carl Hoefer - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (3):287-335.
Modern physics and problems of knowledge.Paul M. Clark (ed.) - 1981 - Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Relationism and relativity.Friedel Weinert - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 51:561-585.
The Cambridge Companion to Einstein.Michel Janssen & Christoph Lehner (eds.) - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Einstein, his theories, and his aesthetic considerations.Gideon Engler - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):21 – 30.
Albert Einstein: Revolutionär oder “Bewahrer des Alten”?Tobias Jung - 2008 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 31 (3):264-281.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-25

Downloads
50 (#319,477)

6 months
9 (#314,693)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marco Giovanelli
Università di Torino

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
The philosophy of quantum mechanics.Max Jammer - 1974 - New York,: Wiley. Edited by Max Jammer.
The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory.Arthur Fine - 1986 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

View all 127 references / Add more references