Health Care Analysis 8 (3):309-319 (2000)
AbstractThis paper investigates legal and moral justificationsof coerced treatment for psychiatric patients who aredetained on the grounds that they may harm others.While the general issues concerning compulsorytreatment and detention have been widely canvassed, ithas seldom, if ever, been noticed that the moralreasons that we may have to detain a person whoappears to be dangerous to others are different fromthe moral reasons we may have to treat him or her. For example, it has not been noticed that compulsorydetention and compulsory treatment are supported bytwo different moral principles, namely the Principleof Harm and the Principle of Beneficence, and,therefore, that the arguments which support compulsorydetention do not also support compulsorytreatment. The conceptual confusion between legitimacyof compulsory detention and legitimacy of compulsorytreatment is exacerbated by the ambiguous wordingutilised in S 3 of the UK Mental Health Act, whichimplies that treatment may be necessary for theprotection of others. Failure to pay attention to these distinctions has led to tragic consequences, in terms of violations of individual autonomy and in terms of public safety
Similar books and articles
One Flu Over The Cuckoo’s Nest: Comparing Legislated Coercive Treatment for Mental Illness with That for Other Illness. [REVIEW]Christopher James Ryan - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):87-93.
Non-Consensual Treatment Is (Nearly Always) Morally Impermissible.Mark J. Cherry - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (4):789-798.
Understanding Eating Disorders: Conceptual and Ethical Issues in the Treatment of Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa.Simona Giordano - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Constitutionalizing the Harm Principle.Dennis J. Baker - 2008 - Criminal Justice Ethics 27 (2):3-28.
Coroners and the Obligation to Protect Public Health: The Case of the Failed UK vCJD Study.C. R. McGowan & A. M. Viens - 2011 - Public Health 125 (4):234-7.
HIV-Infected Psychiatric Patients: Beyond Confidentiality.Ruth Macklin - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (1):3 – 20.
Freedom of Conscience and Health Care in the United States of America: The Conflict Between Public Health and Religious Liberty in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.Peter West-Oram - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (3):237-247.
Competence, Practical Rationality and What a Patient Values.Jillian Craigie - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (6):326-333.
Joel Feinberg and the Justification of Hard Paternalism.Richard J. Arneson - 2005 - Legal Theory 11 (3):259-284.
Detention of Trafficked Persons in Shelters: A Legal and Policy Analysis.Anne T. Gallagher & Elaine Pearson - unknown
An Extra Reason to Roll the Dice: Balancing Harm, Benefit and Autonomy in 'Futile' Cases.David M. Shaw - 2010 - Clinical Ethics 5 (4):219.
Abating Treatment with Critically Ill Patients: Ethical and Legal Limits to the Medical Prolongation of Life.Robert F. Weir - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Allen E. Buchanan & Dan W. Brock - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Offense to Others.Joel Feinberg - 1984 - Oxford University Press.