An Action Can be Both Uncaused and Up to the Agent

In Lumer (ed.), Intentionality, Deliberation, and Autonomy. Ashgate. pp. 243--255 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Libertarian Choice.Stewart Goetz - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (2):195-211.
Locke on the freedom of the will.Vere Chappell - 1994 - In G. A. J. Rogers (ed.), Locke's Philosophy: Content and Context. Oxford University Press. pp. 101--21.
Reasons for Action.Pamela Hieronymi - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):407-427.
What Happens When Someone Acts?J. David Velleman - 1992 - Mind 101 (403):461-481.
Right action and the non-virtuous agent.Liezl van Zyl - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):80-92.
Wisdom and Action Guidance in the Agent-Based Virtue Ethics of Aristotle.S. Thomas Sherman - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):481-506.
Reflections On “Uncaused Beginnings”.William Lane Craig - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (1):72-78.
Agent Causation and Acting for Reasons.Rebekah L. H. Rice - 2011 - American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (4):333-346.
How Is Weakness of the Will Possible?Donald Davidson - 1969 - In Joel Feinberg (ed.), Moral concepts. London,: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-30

Downloads
108 (#159,307)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Carl Ginet
Cornell University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references