Voilà pourquoi je ne suis pas "ontologue"

Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 16 (1):29-45 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The word “ontology” has no meaning outside the context in which it was created. When it was invented, at the beginning of the seventeenth century, the word 'metaphysics' already existed. So the creation of “ontology” had to express a distance with respect to tradition. “Metaphysics” had its roots in Aristotle and his search, his impossible search, for a first principle. This project is taken up again by “ontology” but this time by limiting the Aristotelian intention to the area of univocal formality, while Aristotle had situated himself within the order of dialectical investigation. Current phenomenology tries to re-actualize the Aristotelian intention by emphasizing ontological difference and analogy, while analytic philosophy remains firmly within the tradition of modern ontology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophie des âges de la vie: pourquoi grandir? pourquoi vieillir?Eric Deschavanne - 2007 - Paris: Grasset. Edited by Pierre-Henri Tavoillot.
Instagram: je-suis-là?Charlotte Champion - 2012 - Philosophy of Photography 3 (1):83-88.
Est - Je suis.Stanislas Breton - 2000 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 98 (2):235-249.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-14

Downloads
10 (#1,123,760)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references