- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Thinking Ahead Too Much: Speculative Ethics and Implantable Brain Devices
American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (1):49-51 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
My notes
Similar books and articles
Implantable Smart Technologies : Defining the ‘Sting’ in Data and Device.Gill Haddow, Shawn H. E. Harmon & Leah Gilman - 2016 - Health Care Analysis 24 (3):210-227.
Informed Consent in Implantable BCI Research: Identifying Risks and Exploring Meaning.Eran Klein - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1299-1317.
The ethical and legal implications of deactivating an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a patient with terminal cancer.R. England, T. England & J. Coggon - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (9):538-540.
Embodiment and Estrangement: Results from a First-in-Human “Intelligent BCI” Trial.F. Gilbert, M. Cook, T. O’Brien & J. Illes - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (1):83-96.
Implantable Devices Should Come With a Contract.Dena S. Davis - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (8):23-25.
Implantable brain chips — will they change who we are?Phd Daniel Dennett - 2001 - Lahey Clinic Medical Ethics Journal 1:6-7.
Implantable brain chips: ethical and policy issues.Phd Ellen Mcgee & Gerald MaguirePhd Jr - 2001 - Lahey Clinic Medical Ethics Journal 3:1-8.
Brain, mind and machine: What are the implications of deep brain stimulation for perceptions of personal identity, agency and free will?Nir Lipsman & Walter Glannon - 2012 - Bioethics 27 (9):465-470.
Mechanical Memory and the Speculative Sentence.Peter R. Nennig - 2018 - Southwest Philosophy Review 34 (1):181-188.
Hacking the brain: brain–computer interfacing technology and the ethics of neurosecurity.Marcello Ienca & Pim Haselager - 2016 - Ethics and Information Technology 18 (2):117-129.
Wired Patients: Implantable Microchips and Biosensors in Patient Care.Keith A. Bauer - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (3):281-290.
Implantable Brain Chips? Time for Debate.G. Q. Maguire & Ellen M. McGee - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (1):7-13.
Some Notes on Thinking Ahead.Frederic Schick - 1977 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 44.
Taking care of one’s brain: how manipulating the brain changes people’s selves.Jonna Brenninkmeijer - 2010 - History of the Human Sciences 23 (1):107-126.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-06-22
Downloads
22 (#673,588)
6 months
6 (#448,852)
2018-06-22
Downloads
22 (#673,588)
6 months
6 (#448,852)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Deflating the “DBS causes personality changes” bubble.Frederic Gilbert, J. N. M. Viaña & C. Ineichen - 2021 - Neuroethics 14 (1):1-17.
Personality and Authenticity in Light of the Memory-Modifying Potential of Optogenetics: A Reply to Objections about Potential Therapeutic Applicability of Optogenetics.Agnieszka K. Adamczyk & Przemysław Zawadzki - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 15 (2):W4-W7.
The Memory-Modifying Potential of Optogenetics and the Need for Neuroethics.Agnieszka K. Adamczyk & Przemysław Zawadzki - 2020 - NanoEthics 14 (3):207-225.
Controlling Brain Cells With Light: Ethical Considerations for Optogenetic Clinical Trials.Frederic Gilbert, Alexander R. Harris & Robert M. I. Kapsa - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (3):3-11.
Correction to: Deflating the “DBS Causes Personality Changes” Bubble.Frederic Gilbert, J. N. M. Viaña & C. Ineichen - 2018 - Neuroethics 14 (1):19-19.
References found in this work
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression: Postoperative Feelings of Self-Estrangement, Suicide Attempt and Impulsive–Aggressive Behaviours.Frederic Gilbert - 2013 - Neuroethics 6 (3):473-481.
Deep Brain Stimulation and Postoperative Suicidality Among Treatment Resistant Depression Patients: Should Eligibility Protocols Exclude Patients with a History of Suicide Attempts and Anger/Impulsivity?Frédéric Gilbert - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (1):28-35.
Efficacy Testing as a Primary Purpose of Phase 1 Clinical Trials: Is it Applicable to First-in-Human Bionics and Optogenetics Trials?Frederic Gilbert, Alexander R. Harris & Robert M. I. Kapsa - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 3 (2):20-22.
If and then: A critique of speculative nanoethics. [REVIEW]Alfred Nordmann - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (1):31-46.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo