On the definition of objective probabilities by empirical similarity

Synthese 172 (1):79-95 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We suggest to define objective probabilities by similarity-weighted empirical frequencies, where more similar cases get a higher weight in the computation of frequencies. This formula is justified intuitively and axiomatically, but raises the question, which similarity function should be used? We propose to estimate the similarity function from the data, and thus obtain objective probabilities. We compare this definition to others, and attempt to delineate the scope of situations in which objective probabilities can be used.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

General information in relevant logic.Edwin D. Mares - 2009 - Synthese 167 (2):343-362.
Bad company and neo-Fregean philosophy.Matti Eklund - 2009 - Synthese 170 (3):393-414.
Introduction.Gabriele Contessa - 2010 - Synthese 172 (2):193-195.
Real rules.Julia Tanney - 2009 - Synthese 171 (3):499-507.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-24

Downloads
29 (#554,604)

6 months
16 (#161,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Mechanistic probability.Marshall Abrams - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):343-375.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Causality.Judea Pearl - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Truth and probability.Frank Ramsey - 2010 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge. pp. 52-94.
Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks.Judea Pearl - 1986 - Artificial Intelligence 29 (3):241-288.

Add more references