Neuroethics 6 (1):115-128 (2013)

Authors
Samia Hurst
University of Geneva
Frederic Gilbert
University of Tasmania
Abstract
Clinical cases of frontal lobe lesions have been significantly associated with acquired aggressive behaviour. Restoring neuronal and cognitive faculties of aggressive individuals through invasive brain intervention raises ethical questions in general. However, more questions have to be addressed in cases where individuals refuse surgical treatment. The ethical desirability and permissibility of using intrusive surgical brain interventions for involuntary or voluntary treatment of acquired aggressiveness is highly questionable. This article engages with the description of acquired aggressiveness in general, and presents a rare clinical case to illustrate the difficulties of treating this population. To expand the debate further, this article explores the ethics related to invasive brain surgery in three parts: a) it examines coercive involuntary invasive brain surgery for the benefit of protecting others on individuals suffering from acquired aggressiveness who lack decision-making capacities to consent; b) it addresses voluntary psychosurgery on individuals suffering from acquired aggressiveness who are competent to consent; and, c) it questions whether acquired aggressive individuals, who are legally competent, have a duty to consent to invasive brain surgery, in order to maintain their autonomy by reducing or even eliminate their aggressive drives. Ensuring the safety and efficacy of surgical brain interventions could increase the ethical permissibility of voluntary treatment, but it would not necessarily entail ethical justification for proceeding with invasive brain surgery for treatment of intractable acquired aggressive behaviour
Keywords Acquired aggressiveness  Cognitive impairment  Decision-making capacity  Frontal lobe surgery  Involuntary treatment  Personality changes
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-012-9161-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Right of Self‐Termination?J. David Velleman - 1999 - Ethics 109 (3):606-628.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aggressiveness and Dominance.Ulrich Mueller - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):381-382.
Aquinas on Threats and Temptations.Paul Hoffman - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2):225–242.
Acquired Taste.Kevin Melchionne - 2007 - Contemporary Aesthetics.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-10-10

Total views
75 ( #153,734 of 2,504,831 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,831 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes