- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Families and genetic testing : the case of Jane and Phyllis from a four-principles perspective
In Richard E. Ashcroft (ed.), Case Analysis in Clinical Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 165 (2005)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Working up policy : the use of specific disease exemplars in formulating general principles governing childhood genetic testing. [REVIEW]Paula Boddington & Susan Hogben - 2006 - Health Care Analysis 14 (1):1-13.
The family covenant and genetic testing.David J. Doukas & Jessica W. Berg - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):2 – 10.
Can the Four Principles Help in Genetic Screening Decision-Making?Henk ten Have & Pierre Mallia - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (2):131-140.
Predictive genetic testing for conditions that present in childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Argumentation and risk communication about genetic testing: Challenges for healthcare consumers and implications for computer systems.Nancy L. Green - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):113-129.
Future directions in genetic counseling: Practical and ethical considerations.Barbara Biesecker - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):145-160.
Commercial genetic testing in mainland china: Social, financial and ethical issues. [REVIEW]Suli Sui & Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):229-237.
Communication of genetic information within families: The case for familial comity. [REVIEW]Angela Davey, Ainsley Newson & Peter O’Leary - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):161-166.
Attitudes of Rhode Island primary care physicians toward the use of genetic testing for breast cancer.Frances M. Alexakos - unknown
Genetic testing: The appropriate means for a desired goal?Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):167-177.
Representationalism.Benj Hellie - 2009 - In Patrick Wilken, Tim Bayne & Axel Cleeremans (eds.), Oxford Companion to Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
The Benefits and Potential Harms of Genetic Testing for Huntington's Disease: A Case Study.Kathryn Edge - 2008 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 14 (2):14-19.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-06-02
Downloads
17 (#849,202)
6 months
1 (#1,516,429)
2011-06-02
Downloads
17 (#849,202)
6 months
1 (#1,516,429)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics.Raanan Gillon - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):111-116.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo