Erratum to: Companions or patients? The impact of family presence in genetic consultations for inherited breast cancer: Relational autonomy in practice

&
Bioethics 32 (9):643-643 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/bioe.12541

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Companions or patients? The impact of family presence in genetic consultations for inherited breast cancer: Relational autonomy in practice.Roy Gilbar & Sivia Barnoy - 2018 - Bioethics 32 (6):378-387.
Relational Autonomy: An Example from Breast Cancer Nursing.Mary Twomey - 2011 - Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (4):408-413.
The medical decision-making process and the family: The case of breast cancer patients and their husbands.Roy Gilbar & Ora Gilbar - 2008 - Bioethics 23 (3):183-192.
Attitudes of Rhode Island primary care physicians toward the use of genetic testing for breast cancer.Frances M. Alexakos - unknown
Impact of the Word "Cancer": a Pilot Study on Breast Cancer Patients from Pakistan.Bushra Shirazi & Sualeha Siddiq Shekhani - 2017 - Asian Bioethics Review 9 (3):229-238.
Collective Fear, Individualized Risk: the social and cultural context of genetic testing for breast cancer.N. Press, J. R. Fishman & B. A. Koenig - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (3):237-249.
Autonomy and reason: treatment choice in breast cancer.Mary Twomey - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (5):1045-1050.
Breast cancer incidence: what do the figures mean?Ann Johnson & Jane Shekhdar - 2005 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (1):27-31.
Collective Fear, Individualized Risk: the social and cultural context of genetic testing forbreast cancer.N. Press, J. R. Fishman & B. A. Koenig - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (3):237-249.
Racing for Consent: A Feminist Relational Analysis of Informed Consent for Nondiagnostic Breast Cancer Research Biopsies.Skye A. Miner - 2017 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (2):42-60.
Experiential Knowledge, Moral Agency and Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer.Lorraine D'agincourt-Canning - 2003 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)
Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer.M. P. M. Richards - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):93-96.
Survival after breast cancer treatment: the impact of provider volume.Karen Bailie, Iain Dobie, Stephen Kirk & Michael Donnelly - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (5):749-757.
Genetic Testing after Breast Cancer Diagnosis: Implications for Physician-Patient Communications.Nancy Berlinger - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):417-419.
Cultural Basis for Differences Between US and French Clinical Recommendations for Women at Increased Risk of Breast and Ovarian Cancer.Francois Eisinger, G. Geller, W. Burke & N. A. Holtzman - 1999 - The Lancet 353:919-920.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-20

Downloads
13 (#1,013,785)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references