Directions to convict

Abstract

This paper explores the regularity of judicial directions to the jury in a divided trial, to convict. Such directions are uncommon, yet current Australian authority sanctions directions of this type. This paper will explore the reasons why other jurisdictions, most recently Canada, have limited the ability of judges to instruct juries to convict, and argues that it is time the Australian position is reappraised judicially or otherwise.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Unconscious insights.Robert S. Siegler - 2000 - Current Directions in Psychological Science 9 (3):79-83.
Why My Opinion Shouldn't Count.Michael Byron - 2000 - Journal of Social Philosophy 31 (3):307-315.
'New age' philosophies of science: constructivism, feminism and postmodernism.N. Koertge - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):667-683.
The right to trial by jury.Thom Brooks - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):197–212.
Children's Participation: An Arendtian criticism.Sharon Jessop - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (9):979-996.
Metacognitive development.D. Kuhn - 2000 - Current Directions in Psychological Science 9:178-181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
7 (#1,310,999)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references