Does the Argument from Realization Generalize? Responses to Kim

Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):79-98 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By quantifying over properties we cannot create new properties any more than by quantifying over individuals we can create new individuals. Someone murdered Jones, and the murderer is either Smith or Jones or Wang. That “someone,” who murdered Jones, is not a person in addition to Smith, Jones, and Wang, and it would be absurd to posit a disjunctive person, Smith‐or‐Jones‐or‐Wang, with whom to identify the murderer. The same goes for second‐order properties and their realizers. (Kim 1997a, 201)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Realization Reductios, and Category Inclusion.Ronald P. Endicott - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (4):213-219.
Realization and Physicalism.Robert Francescotti - 2010 - Philosophical Psychology 23 (5):601-616.
Realization and the metaphysics of mind.Thomas W. Polger - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):233 – 259.
Understanding the Dimensions of Realization.Lawrence A. Shapiro - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (4):213-222.
Multiply realizing scientific properties and their instances.Carl Gillett - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (6):727-738.
Two Confusions Concerning Multiple Realization.Thomas W. Polger - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):537-547.
Emergence, supervenience, and realization.Rex Welshon - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):39-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
114 (#152,446)

6 months
25 (#111,582)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Bradley Rives
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
Carl Gillett
Northern Illinois University