Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):171-198 (2004)
AbstractArguments in favor of legalized assisted suicide often center on issues of personal privacy and freedom of choice over one's body. Many disability advocates assert, however, that autonomy arguments neglect the complex sociopolitical determinants of despair for people with disabilities. Specifically, they argue that social approval of suicide for individuals with irreversible conditions is discriminatory and that relaxing restrictions on assisted suicide would jeopardize, not advance, the freedom of persons with disabilities to direct the lives they choose. This paper examines the idea promoted by some proponents of assisted suicide that it is reasonable to be depressed about one's diminished quality of life in cases of irreversible illness or disability and, therefore, such depression should not call into question the individual's competence to request assistance in dying. The concept of rational depression is defined and examined in the context of: four real-life cases involving individuals with disabilities who requested assistance in dying; a set of criteria commonly applied to decision-making to determine rationality; and research bearing on the emotional status of people with disabilities. It is concluded that although disability is associated with particular socially mediated stressors, there is no theoretical or empirical evidence to indicate that depression and its role in the right to die is dynamically different, more natural, or more reasonable for disabled people than for non-disabled people.
Similar books and articles
Criticizing and reforming segregated facilities for persons with disabilities.Adrienne Asch, Jeffrey Blustein & David T. Wasserman - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (2-3):157-168.
Deciding on death: Conventions and contestations in the context of disability. [REVIEW]Margrit Shildrick - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (2-3):209-219.
Disability, respect and justice.Linda Barclay - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):154-171.
Disability Oppression in the Contemporary U. S. Capitalist Workplace.Pamela Robert - 2003 - Science and Society 67 (2):136 - 159.
Everworse: What's Wrong with Selecting for Disability?Mark Greene & Steven Augello - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (2):131-140.
Insult to injury: A disability-sensitive response to professor Smolensky's call for parental tort liability for preimplantation genetic interventions.Alicia R. Ouellette - unknown
Unhealthy disabled: Treating chronic illnesses as disabilities.Susan Wendell - 2001 - Hypatia 16 (4):17-33.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Depression, possibilities, and competence: A phenomenological perspective. [REVIEW]Gerben Meynen - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (3):181-193.
Physician–Patient Relationship, Assisted Suicide and the Italian Constitutional Court.E. Turillazzi, A. Maiese, P. Frati, M. Scopetti & M. Di Paolo - 2021 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 18 (4):671-681.
US Hospice Structure and its Implications for the “Right to Die” Debate: An Interdisciplinary Study of the “Feeling of Being a Burden to Others”.Harold Braswell - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (4):525-534.
Depression, Capacity, and a Request to Discontinue Life-Sustaining Treatment.Adam M. Peña - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (7):70-71.
US Hospice Structure and its Implications for the “Right to Die” Debate.Harold Braswell - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (4):525-534.