Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (4):347-366 (1986)
AbstractThe central dilemma concerning randomized clinical trials (RCTs) arises out of some simple facts about causal methodology (RCTs are the best way to generate the reliable causal knowledge necessary for optimally-informed action) and a prima facie plausible principle concerning how physicians should treat their patients (always do what it is most reasonable to believe will be best for the patient). A number of arguments related to this in the literature are considered. Attempts to avoid the dilemma fail. Appeals to informed consent and mechanisms for minimizing the resulting harm are important for policy, but informed consent is problematic and mechanisms for minimization of harm do not address the dilemma. Appeals to some sort of contract model of justification are promising and illuminating. Keywords: randomized clinical trials, ethics CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
Similar books and articles
Therapeutic Beneficence and Patient Recruitment in Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.Howard Mann - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (2):35 – 36.
An Argument That All Prerandomized Clinical Trials Are Unethical.Don Marquis - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (4):367-383.
Individual Autonomy and the Double-Blind Controlled Experiment: The Case of Desperate Volunteers.N. Waller Bruce - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1).
Unique Ethical Concerns in Clinical Trials Comparing Psychosocial and Psychopharmalogical Interventions.Lisa R. Stines & Norah C. Feeny - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (2-3):234 – 246.
Correlates of Parental Participation During Informed Consent for Randomized Clinical Trials in the Treatment of Childhood Leukemia.Dennis Drotar, Victoria Miller, Victoria Willard, Kyle Anthony & Eric Kodish - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (1):1 – 15.
Must Research Participants Understand Randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
Clinical Equipoise and the Incoherence of Research Ethics.Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):151 – 165.
Consent and Randomized Clinical Trials: Are There Moral or Design Problems?Loretta Kopelman - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (4):317-345.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Experimental Design: Ethics, Integrity and the Scientific Method.Jonathan Lewis - 2020 - In Ron Iphofen (ed.), Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Cham, Switzerland: pp. 459-474.
For the Common Good: Philosophical Foundations of Research Ethics.Alex John London - 2021 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
The Ethics of Clinical Care and the Ethics of Clinical Research: Yin and Yang.Charles J. Kowalski, Raymond J. Hutchinson & Adam J. Mrdjenovich - 2017 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (1):7-32.
Community-Equipoise and the Ethics of Randomized Clinical Trials.Fred Gifford - 1995 - Bioethics 9 (2):127–148.
Clinical Research in Context: Reexamining the Distinction Between Research and Practice.J. A. Anderson - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (1):46-63.
References found in this work
No references found.