Ethics of patient activation: exploring its relation to personal responsibility, autonomy and health disparities

Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (10):670-675 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discussions of patient-centred care and patient autonomy in bioethics have tended to focus on the decision-making context and the process of obtaining informed consent, leaving open the question of how patients ought to be counselled in the daily maintenance of their health and management of chronic disease. Patient activation is an increasingly prominent counselling approach and measurement tool that aims to improve patients’ confidence and skills in managing their own health conditions. The strategy, which has received little conceptual or ethical analysis, raises important questions about how clinicians ought to foster confidence and a sense of control in their patients without exposing them to blame, stigma and other harms. In this paper, we describe patient activation, discuss its relationship to personal responsibility, autonomy and health disparities, and make recommendations regarding its use and measurement.

Similar books and articles

Health disparities and autonomy.Andrew Courtwright - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (8):431-439.
Promoting patient autonomy: Looking back.Gene H. Stollerman - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
The virtue of moral responsibility and the obligations of patients.Candace Cummins Gauthier - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):153 – 166.
The Impact of Web 2.0 on the Doctor-Patient Relationship.Bernard Lo & Lindsay Parham - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (1):17-26.
Re-Evaluating Professional Autonomy in Health Care.Henk Ten Have - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (5):503-513.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-21

Downloads
477 (#38,220)

6 months
91 (#45,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David DeGrazia
George Washington University
Sophie Gibert
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Moral dimensions: permissibility, meaning, blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829-839.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 2002 - Mind 111 (442):323-354.

View all 23 references / Add more references