Does Investment in the Sexes Differ When Fathers Are Absent?

Human Nature 19 (3):263-276 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study examines child survival and growth in a patrilineal Ethiopian community as a function of father absence and sex. In line with evolutionary predictions for sex-biased parental investment, the absence of a father and associated constraints on household resources is more detrimental for sons’ than daughters’ survival in infancy. Father absence doubles a son’s risk of dying in infancy but has a positive influence on the well-being of female members of the household, improving daughter survival, growth, and maternal nutritional status. Lack of paternal investment may be compensated for by other matrilateral kin through increased reciprocity between mother, daughter, and sister

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brothers and sisters.Monique Borgerhoff Mulder - 1998 - Human Nature 9 (2):119-161.
Father absence and age at menarche.Sabine Hoier - 2003 - Human Nature 14 (3):209-233.
Motivating grandparental investment.Debra Friedman & Michael Hechter - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (1):24-25.
Expanding Opportunity Structures.Dawn B. Neill - 2010 - Human Nature 21 (2):165-185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
31 (#488,695)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?