Simone de Beauvoir, Luce Irigaray. Una rilettura

Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 28 (54) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While Beauvoir admitted that feminists refused to be women-alibi as she had been, Irigaray recognized that she was one of the many who had read The Second sex being reanimated by it. Nevertheless the two authors have been considered the reference of two opposite feminist theoretical and political paradigms, again and again – emancipation vs liberation, constructivism vs essentialism, materialism vs symbolical. Through the rereading of their main issues, a new feminist paradigm can be developed for the contemporary challenges.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sexes and Geneologies.Gillian C. Gill (ed.) - 1993 - Cambridge University Press.
The other as another other.Karen Green - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (4):1-15.
The Feminine Subject.Susan J. Hekman - 2014 - Malden, MA: Polity.
Hegel and feminist philosophy.Kimberly Hutchings - 2003 - Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Luce Irigaray and the philosophy of sexual difference.Alison Stone - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Feminist imagination: genealogies in feminist theory.Vikki Bell - 1999 - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-05

Downloads
13 (#950,112)

6 months
4 (#573,918)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Federica Giardini
Università degli Studi Roma Tre

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references