An Onto-Epistemological Chronology of Plato’s Dialogues

Abstract

This paper aims to suggest a new arrangement of Plato’s dialogues based on a different theory of the ontological as well as epistemological development of his philosophy. In this new arrangement, which proposes essential changes in the currently agreed upon chronology of the dialogues, Parmenides must be considered as criticizing an elementary theory of Forms and not the theory of so-called middle dialogues. Dated all as later than Parmenides, the so-called middle and late dialoguesare regarded as two consecutive endeavors to resolve the problems drawn out in there; an effort in the theory of knowledge through Theaetetus, Meno and Phaedo and another in ontology through the second part of Parmenides, Sophist and Republic. Key Words: Plato; chronology; development; ontology; epistemology Introduction There are many determinative factors regarding the chronology of the dialogues about which our informationis terribly deficient. There is no certain evidence about the date of each of the dialogues, nor any reliable information about the beginning and ending time of Plato’s writing. The most determinative issue among all chronological matters, I am inclined to insist, is the question that if did Plato use to manipulate or, as Dionysius of Halicarnassus said (1808, 406), polish, comb and curl his previously written dialogues and, if so, to what extent? That there is almost no answer to this most crucial issue shows how far deficient, indefinite and inconclusive the chronological plans can be. The fact that we do not even have enough information to decide, in case of Socratic dialogues, to what extent they are reporting or reflecting the actual dialogues of historical Socrates, and to what extent they are Plato-made stories so that even now we have a schizophrenic character between Socrates and Plato, can be good evidence for this deficiency. There are, nevertheless, somemore certain informations that can be contributive in case of the arrangement of some dialogues. a) The only external evidence provided by Aristotle that Lawswas written after Republic (Politics, II, 6) which was repeated by others . b) Few internal evidences provided by references in dialogues themselves including: i) the cross references in the Sophist 217a and Politicus 257a and 258b which indicate the prior composition of Sophist; ii) Timaeus 27 which hints to Critias as its sequel; iii) Theaetetus 183e where Socrates says he met Parmenides when he was young which has been taken as a reference to Parmenides; iv) a similar reference to the discussion of young Socrates with Parmenides this time in Sophist 217c; v) Sophist 216a refers to a previous discussion which has been thought to be referring to Theaetetus, and vi) the Timaeus 17b-19b in which Socrates tries to summarize his previous dialogue about the structure of cities, and the kind of men these cities must bring up to become the best people and so on which, among the dialogues we have now, must refer to Republic.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Plato's Introduction of Forms.R. M. Dancy - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Did Plato Write Socratic Dialogues?Charles H. Kahn - 1981 - Classical Quarterly 31 (02):305-.
Plato's Theory of Recollection.Norman Gulley - 1954 - Classical Quarterly 4 (3-4):194-.
Ontology and Relations in Plato's "Phaedo," "Parmenides," and "Timaeus".Mark Leroy Mcpherran - 1982 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Plato's Moral Psychology.Andrew Crawford Houston - 1986 - Dissertation, Cornell University

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-05

Downloads
487 (#35,089)

6 months
139 (#20,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mohammad Bagher Ghomi
University of Tehran

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Good-bye to the Third Man.Constance Meinwald - 1992 - In Richard Kraut (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge University Press. pp. 365--396.
Anamnesis in Plato's "Meno and Phaedo".R. E. Allen - 1959 - Review of Metaphysics 13 (1):165 - 174.
Plato's Theory of Knowledge. [REVIEW]R. S. - 1935 - Journal of Philosophy 32 (19):520-522.
Comments on John Moore's Paper.John Dillon - 1973 - In J. M. E. Maravcsik (ed.), Patterns in Plato's Thought. Dordrecht: Reidel. pp. 72--77.

Add more references